import PageTitle from "@/components/layout/page-title"; import { createMetadata } from "@/lib/metadata"; import backgroundImg from "./sundar.jpg"; export const metadata = createMetadata({ title: "fuckyougoogle.zip 🖕", description: "This is a horrible idea.", canonical: "/zip", }); export const Terminal = () => (
sundar@google: ~$ mv /root /stable_products_that_people_rely_on/ googledomains.zip /tmp/
sundar@google: ~$ crontab{" "} -l

# TODO(someone else): make super duper sure this only deletes actual zip files and *NOT* the sketchy domains ending with file extensions released by us & purchased on our registrar (which i just yeeted btw cuz i'm & also my evil superpowers are fueled by my reckless disregard for the greater good of the internet). - xoxo sundar <3
@monthly     rm -f /tmp/ *.zip

sundar@google: ~$ reboot 0
); fuckyougoogle.zip 🖕 --- ### This reaction seems a little extreme? A little-known monopolistic internet conglomorate simply unleashed [multiple](https://blog.google/products/registry/8-new-top-level-domains-for-dads-grads-tech/) TLDs with coincidentally matching binary file extentions onto the web and then abruptly [exited the consumer domain registrar business](https://newsroom.squarespace.com/blog/squarespace-domains-updates), what's the big deal? - **Bobby Rauch:** [The Dangers of Google's .zip TLD](https://medium.com/@bobbyrsec/the-dangers-of-googles-zip-tld-5e1e675e59a5) - **Fortinet:** [Threat Actors Add .zip Domains to Their Phishing Arsenals](https://www.fortinet.com/blog/industry-trends/threat-actors-add-zip-domains-to-phishing-arsenals) - **Cisco Talos:** [.Zip top-level domains draw potential for information leaks](https://blog.talosintelligence.com/zip-tld-information-leak/) - **Ars Technica:** [Google pushes .zip and .mov domains onto the Internet, and the Internet pushes back](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/05/critics-say-googles-new-zip-and-mov-domains-will-be-a-boon-to-scammers/) - **Malwarebytes:** [Zip domains, a bad idea nobody asked for](https://www.threatdown.com/blog/zip-domains-a-bad-idea-nobody-asked-for/) - **Wired:** [The Real Risks in Google's New .Zip and .Mov Domains](https://www.wired.com/story/google-zip-mov-domains-phishing-risks/) - **Netcraft:** [Phishing attacks already using the .zip TLD](https://www.netcraft.com/blog/phishing-attacks-already-using-the-zip-tld/) - **Bleeping Computer:** [New ZIP domains spark debate among cybersecurity experts](https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-zip-domains-spark-debate-among-cybersecurity-experts/) - **Red Canary:** [Broken zippers: Detecting deception with Google's new ZIP domains](https://redcanary.com/blog/threat-detection/google-zip-domains/) - **Kaspersky:** [Beware the .zip and .mov domains!](https://usa.kaspersky.com/blog/zip-mov-domain-extension-confusion/28351/) - **Palo Alto Networks:** [New Top Level Domains .zip and .mov open the door for new attacks](https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA14u000000g1wOCAQ) - **Google, twenty years ago:** ["Don't be evil"](https://web.archive.org/web/20050204181615/http://investor.google.com/conduct.html)